Message boards : Number crunching : Work Units that fail in under one minute - Report HERE
Author | Message |
---|---|
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
|
Los Alcoholicos~La Muis Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 1,041,724 RAC: 0 |
HOMSdt_homDB027_1dtj__352_898_0 Intel celeron tualatin 1,4GHz - Win98 HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__352_1699_0 AMD Athlon XP 2600+ - WinXP Professional SP2 HOMSdt_homDB030_1dtj__352_1518_0 AMD Athlon XP 2600+ - WinXP Professional SP2 HOMSdt_homDB009_1dtj__352_1987_1 AMD Athlon XP 2400+ - WinXP Professional SP2 HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__352_798_2 Intel PII 350MHz - WinXP Professional SP2 (It took a little longer to fail, but is a very slow pc) HOMSdt_homDB011_1dtj__352_1628_0 PPC G4 2GHz - MacOSX 10.3.9 HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__352_601_2 PPC Dual G5 2GHz - MacOSX 10.4.5 |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
3/4/2006 6:26:59 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__340_50_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10015363 And what's with the claimed credit? "0.0793899404026963" .. You don't really keep track of the credits with that precision do you? *snicker* (There's no chance that I'll be turning in the trillions of results to ever get a point out of the numbers on the far right.. :) Previously posted: ------- stderr.txt # random seed: 3468381 # cpu_run_time_pref: 86400 --- 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Starting BOINC client version 5.2.13 for windows_intelx86 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||libcurl/7.14.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8 zlib/1.2.3 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Executing as a daemon 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Data directory: C:Program FilesBOINC 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||BOINC is running as a service and as a non-system user. 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||No application graphics will be available. 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Memory: 1023.48 MB physical, 1.65 GB virtual 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||Disk: 29.29 GB total, 3.84 GB free 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM|rosetta@home|Computer ID: 121218; location: home; project prefs: default 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||General prefs: from rosetta@home (last modified 2005-12-29 13:52:58) 2/19/2006 6:24:18 PM||General prefs: no separate prefs for home; using your defaults 2/19/2006 6:24:19 PM||Remote control not allowed; using loopback address ------ 3/4/2006 6:26:59 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__340_50_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)) 3/4/2006 6:26:59 PM||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited 3/4/2006 6:26:59 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__340_50_0 finished ------ 25.98 seconds.. it sure failed quickly. Mine is a 754 pin Athlon 64; running WinXP Pro SP2. (supposedly, fully updated.. minus the microsoft anti spyware package.) Panda Titanium antivirus. Running on a MSI K8T Neo motherboard. ---- The WU in question failed 3 times.. |
Scribe Send message Joined: 2 Nov 05 Posts: 284 Credit: 157,359 RAC: 0 |
As Dr Baker said elsewhere - there were only a subset that failed--Divya identified the problem and fixed it. for experts, the problem was that the "-termini" option adds a proton to the N terminus, but for proline there is no place to put the proton, and for a subset of the 1dtj homologues there was an N terminal proline. this is the sort of mistake that only gets made once--it has now been fixed. Do we now need this sticky? |
dag Send message Joined: 16 Dec 05 Posts: 106 Credit: 1,000,020 RAC: 0 |
I'm tired. HEY MOD9!! Why don't you write a query to do this?? ON INTEL PENTIUM R OS = WINDOZ XP + SP2 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12543070 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12886882 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13121126 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13142734 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13391574 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13391593 ON INTEL OS = WIN2K https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13120701 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13200669 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13207899 ON INTEL XEON OS = LINUX 2.4 (at least two different systems) https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12612776 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12797558 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12817678 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12837769 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12843045 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12871697 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12885622 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12893021 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12923657 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12923657 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12927304 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13010256 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13012697 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13014030 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13105842 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116789 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116799 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116800 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116808 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116813 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116842 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116853 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116857 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116864 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13116865 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13149591 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13209450 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13215689 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13217161 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13220449 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13401124 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=13402189 dag --Finding aliens is cool, but understanding the structure of proteins is useful. |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
|
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
From Mikus: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1106#12013 HOMSdt_homDB030_1dtj__352_577 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10322648 HOMSdt_homDB003_1dtj__352_744 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10339303 After failing on the 8th, they were handed out again on the 14th. |
JChojnacki Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 71 Credit: 10,633,777 RAC: 3,777 |
All these failed in under one minute. WU's: HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__352_437_0 HOMSdt_homDB030_1dtj__352_723_1 HOMSdt_homDB003_1dtj__352_583_1 Computer 420: CPU type GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz Number of CPUs 2 Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00) Memory 2045.52 MB Cache 976.56 KB Swap space 3939.82 MB Total disk space 172.76 GB Free Disk Space 93.22 GB Hope it helps. Joel |
Jon Kennedy Send message Joined: 1 Oct 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 418,027 RAC: 0 |
My results that failed around a minute and the workunits: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12943155 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10294520 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=12792095 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10278745 Both had three tries and three failures. My computer https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=7476 |
Evan Send message Joined: 23 Dec 05 Posts: 268 Credit: 402,585 RAC: 0 |
[this one failed at model 1 step 21985 twice] https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/show_host_detail.php?hostid=143996 |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
[this one failed at model 1 step 21985 twice] https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=11046932 is the workunit. FA_RLXc9_hom009_1c9oA_359_287 failed on a p4, but succeeded on a mobile pIII. Strange. |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10816289 HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__352_1905_1 March 12th. |
mewbysea Send message Joined: 29 Jan 06 Posts: 17 Credit: 15,843,832 RAC: 1,618 |
Here's another one -- failed for 3 users HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__352_1177 wuid=10684378 computer 169851 = HP D530 SFF w/ Pentium 4 @ 2.6 GHz (stock) running WIN XP SP2 |
bruce boytler Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 68 Credit: 3,565,442 RAC: 0 |
HOMSdt_homDB027_1dtj__352_875 HOMSdt_homDB030_1dtj__352_163 HOMSdt_homDB004_1dtj__352_123 HOMSti_homDB025_1tif__346_132 HOMSdt_homDB011_1dtj__340_114 NO_MORE_RELAX_CYCLES_1dtj_214_18 |
Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
|
Joe59 Send message Joined: 16 Dec 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 43,529 RAC: 0 |
Unit homsdt_homdb004_1dtj__352_1433 has failed on my computer AMD Athlon64 X2 4200+ and WinXP SP2 This unit has failed also for two other people. Here you can find this WU: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10408204 |
Christoph Send message Joined: 10 Dec 05 Posts: 57 Credit: 1,512,386 RAC: 0 |
[This WU stops at step 20995] HB_BARCODE_30_1b3aA_351_15946 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=12025181 --- P4 1500 MHZ 640 MB RAM WinXP SP2 |
Jon Kennedy Send message Joined: 1 Oct 05 Posts: 6 Credit: 418,027 RAC: 0 |
Here's another WU that stopped for me in just under a minute - and failed on two other systems, even earlier, too: https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/workunit.php?wuid=10812981 |
BennyRop Send message Joined: 17 Dec 05 Posts: 555 Credit: 140,800 RAC: 0 |
I got two more of the 25 second failures. It looked like they instantly failed on the first machine, and where ghosted or lost on the second machine, and had to wait this long for me to become the 3rd failure. :) That's probably what's happening with other of these failures showing up all of a sudden after a couple weeks of silence. |
David Baker Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 705 Credit: 559,847 RAC: 0 |
I got two more of the 25 second failures. It looked like they instantly failed on the first machine, and where ghosted or lost on the second machine, and had to wait this long for me to become the 3rd failure. :) thanks for letting us know--these work units should have been out of the system weeks ago; I'll check into why they are still around |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work Units that fail in under one minute - Report HERE
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org