Target CPU Runtime for CASP7

Author	Message
AnRM Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 123 Credit: 1,355,486 RAC: 0	Message 16456 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 17:43:27 UTC I believe this question was asked before, but I can't seem to find an answer: Is there an optimum TCR that is suggested for Rosetta and especially for CASP7? If this has been answered before, my apologies. Thanks.....Rog. ID: 16456 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

senatoralex85 Send message Joined: 27 Sep 05 Posts: 66 Credit: 169,644 RAC: 0	Message 16458 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 18:08:08 UTC - in response to Message 16456. Last modified: 17 May 2006, 18:10:46 UTC I believe this question was asked before, but I can't seem to find an answer: Is there an optimum TCR that is suggested for Rosetta and especially for CASP7? If this has been answered before, my apologies. Thanks.....Rog. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=669#10377 Above is a link to the FAQ that explains this. If you have any further questions, I probably will not be able to answer them but I am sure someone else here will! Sorry I could not get BBC code to work. ID: 16458 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

anders n Send message Joined: 19 Sep 05 Posts: 403 Credit: 537,991 RAC: 0	Message 16460 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 18:15:43 UTC - in response to Message 16456. I believe this question was asked before, but I can't seem to find an answer: Is there an optimum TCR that is suggested for Rosetta and especially for CASP7? If this has been answered before, my apologies. Thanks.....Rog. Dr Baker posted this earlier. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1615#16393 Anders n ID: 16460 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Moderator9 Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 22 Jan 06 Posts: 1014 Credit: 0 RAC: 0	Message 16463 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 18:24:08 UTC - in response to Message 16460. ... Dr Baker posted this earlier. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/forum_thread.php?id=1615#16393 Anders n Correct. 8 hours is the recommendation. On a dedicated system you might even go to 10, as long as you are running smoothly. Moderator9 ROSETTA@home FAQ Moderator Contact ID: 16463 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

AnRM Send message Joined: 18 Sep 05 Posts: 123 Credit: 1,355,486 RAC: 0	Message 16467 - Posted: 17 May 2006, 18:32:48 UTC Last modified: 17 May 2006, 18:33:08 UTC Many thanks to all.....Cheers, Rog. ID: 16467 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

rbpeake Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 168 Credit: 247,828 RAC: 0	Message 16506 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 0:47:52 UTC - in response to Message 16463. Correct. 8 hours is the recommendation. On a dedicated system you might even go to 10, as long as you are running smoothly. Been running 12 hours on two dedicated systems with no problems! I think the determining factor is how patient are you before you want to send in a result. 12 hours works right now for me. :) Regards, Bob P. ID: 16506 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

casio7131 Send message Joined: 10 Oct 05 Posts: 35 Credit: 149,748 RAC: 0	Message 16519 - Posted: 18 May 2006, 6:46:03 UTC i've been using 16 hours and haven't had an error for the past couple of weeks on any of my 3 computers (seems like most of the bugs are out) --- i use 12 hours on ralph. i'll only drop to 8 hours if the deadlines are shortened to a few days or so. ID: 16519 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote