Questions and Answers : Wish list : Are you considering GPU usage?
Author | Message |
---|---|
z2rus Send message Joined: 14 Jan 06 Posts: 1 Credit: 2,832,389 RAC: 0 |
Just wonder what about possible GPU usage in future rosetta versions? Some of distributed projects has beta versions of clients with GPU co-processing. |
Feet1st Send message Joined: 30 Dec 05 Posts: 1755 Credit: 4,690,520 RAC: 0 |
Yes, Dr. Baker has said they are working towards that. Such things take considerable time. They are ALSO working on a sort of Rosetta video game where YOU decide how to wrap the proteins, based on feedback of the energy level achieved. That would be really fun. And will be a great way for people to get a more concrete understanding of what Rosetta is doing, and how difficult it is to do the task well. Add this signature to your EMail: Running Microsoft's "System Idle Process" will never help cure cancer, AIDS nor Alzheimer's. But running Rosetta@home just might! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/ |
Roy Send message Joined: 14 Feb 07 Posts: 3 Credit: 10,309 RAC: 0 |
Dr. Baker said that ATi Radeon X1900XTX has such computing power as thousands of x86 CPUs,but nVidia's GPUs couldn't |
kevan-in-devon Send message Joined: 8 Nov 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 14,772 RAC: 0 |
GPU co-processing would be brilliant as most peoples wideo cards sit doing nothing, mine gets about 30mins use a day at the most then just sits idle while i browse the web and listen to music. Not a lot of work at all considering its a 512mb x1600 |
kuarl Send message Joined: 10 Nov 07 Posts: 3 Credit: 177,515 RAC: 0 |
GPU co-processing would be brilliant as most peoples wideo cards sit doing nothing, mine gets about 30mins use a day at the most then just sits idle while i browse the web and listen to music. Not a lot of work at all considering its a 512mb x1600 hi, in this day I'm studying the CUDA library used to develop data intensive application on top of nvidia 8800 series, and I would try to help you using that power. A project to use cuda library in boinc already exist? eventually where I can find source code of rosetta or other boinc project to do some tests? Fernando, Italy |
The_Bad_Penguin Send message Joined: 5 Jun 06 Posts: 2751 Credit: 4,271,025 RAC: 0 |
Once again, guess who is at the forefront (gpu, ps3, pflop, etc)? None other than F@H: April 23, 2008 Folding@home and Simbios
What's that old saying? Oh yeah, "Lead, follow, or get out of the way!!!" RV770 chip performs great AMD's RV770 to have 800 stream processors? |
Stephen Send message Joined: 26 Apr 08 Posts: 32 Credit: 429,286 RAC: 0 |
Just wonder what about possible GPU usage in future rosetta versions? I would also like to see a GPU client. I have the money to go out and buy the best performing GPU (regardless of cost), but I would also like to see some benchmarks to determine which GPU I should buy. The other issue with GPU is the question of if SLI will be a problem. |
Matthew Maples Send message Joined: 19 Oct 06 Posts: 5 Credit: 135,659 RAC: 0 |
I would like to see this too. An HD 4850 and HD 4870 has over 1 Terraflop of computing power (1.0 and 1.2 I belive) and the HD 4870 x2 has over 2 Terraflops, much more than even the fastest quad core. Folding@Home has a GPU client, cant wait for Rosetta@Home. |
zd Send message Joined: 25 Oct 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 206,179 RAC: 0 |
Once again, guess who is at the forefront (gpu, ps3, pflop, etc)? I have 5 teraflops power doing nothing most games for 1 hour a day. What a waste considering that could help my fellow human. |
Murasaki Send message Joined: 20 Apr 06 Posts: 303 Credit: 511,418 RAC: 0 |
Some of the scientists have tested GPU processing of Rosetta tasks in the last couple of years. While a small number of functions benefitted from the abilities of a GPU, most of the Rosetta work did not. In general terms GPUs are great for tasks that you can split into small chunks (each requiring a low amount of memory) that can be run in parallel. Unfortunately a lot of Rosetta work requires a large amount of memory or needs to be run in sequence, thereby losing the advantages of the GPU. You can read further discussions about GPU processing on Rosetta in the Number Crunching Forum on the main message board. If you want to use your GPU for protein related research you may want to give POEM@home a shot. They have been trying to relaunch their GPU client in the last couple of months, though I haven't been paying attention to their progress. |
Charles C. Send message Joined: 5 Oct 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,008,810 RAC: 0 |
rosetta need to upgrade the computing prefs are not up to date standards with other projects. the computing algorithm suffer of very severe outdated function which are not often with recent GPU like mine Geforce970 GTX. so please, make your project up to date |
GLLR Send message Joined: 13 Jan 12 Posts: 1 Credit: 89,896 RAC: 0 |
I would like to see work for GPU's. I run a R9 290X on several projects which is far superior and energy efficient than assigning 7 of my 8 cpu cores requiring far more energy for very little work. I have yet to run any GPU tasks on other projects that really task my GPU much. I have seen were some contributors have been able to edit their config files to allow running two projects at the same time. I may try that as I have no temperature restrictions under full load. Those projects that only use CPU's to perform work I rarely bother to contribute anymore. It just is not worth the additional energy costs. Hope your team can catch up with the times and become a bit environmentally greener. I do think your project is worth contributing to, but not at this cost of inefficiency. |
qKVDKiCoUNJeXhN4k5C65X4WPb3 Send message Joined: 11 Dec 16 Posts: 2 Credit: 960,125 RAC: 0 |
I personally advise against the use of a GPU, and while it will mean increased computation, people crunching on the CPU will not be able to hit high RAC's as easily, and one of the parts I like about Rosetta is that it has CPU tasks only. |
Alessandro Losavio Send message Joined: 3 May 18 Posts: 1 Credit: 43,481 RAC: 0 |
Maybe a reasonable trade-off is to have two versions of Rosetta. One which use GPU and the other which use CPU only. Is this feasible? |
Aurum Send message Joined: 12 Jul 17 Posts: 32 Credit: 38,158,977 RAC: 0 |
Maybe a reasonable trade-off is to have two versions of Rosetta. One which use GPU and the other which use CPU only.It's extremely important that they be separate. The controls for CPU projects has to be totally separate from those for GPU projects. My compute node has a range of computer capabilities and one-size does NOT fit all in distributed computing. Especially when The Beast of BOINC consumes all of your RAM. |
futurenz Send message Joined: 30 Mar 14 Posts: 1 Credit: 497,602 RAC: 0 |
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/ATI_Radeon |
Questions and Answers :
Wish list :
Are you considering GPU usage?
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org