4.81 - hours crunching and 0 sec cpu time reported?

Author	Message
Los Alcoholicos~La Muis Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 1,041,724 RAC: 0	Message 7147 - Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 8:38:00 UTC Last modified: 22 Dec 2005, 8:43:49 UTC Isn't this strange: since the 4.81 client some of the wu's doesn't communicate cpu time anymore and so there is no claimed credit. example: 1n0u__topology_sample_207_5693_0 It crunched for almost 2 hours, finished and was uploaded. The resultpage shows success. Valid, but it reported 0 sec. cpu time???? Since the 4.81 client I got 4 results with no cpu time/claimed credit (Result ID 4468749, 4422076, 3452653 and 2244792. 7 wu's errored out in seconds and 3 wu's however reported the correct cpu time/claimed credit. (The host is a Celeron Tualatin 1400MHz - Win98) ID: 7147 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 28 Sep 05 Posts: 209 Credit: 139,545 RAC: 0	Message 7183 - Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 15:48:29 UTC - in response to Message 7147. An observation only... Can't explain the 2 hours crunch time, however all these WUs have a granted credit of 0.001, 3 decimal places. The other web screens only show 2 decimal places so I suspect the 1 is truncated. ID: 7183 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Divide Overflow Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 82 Credit: 921,382 RAC: 0	Message 7230 - Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 19:45:42 UTC Last modified: 22 Dec 2005, 19:48:51 UTC I believe that there are some known problems with Windows 98 reporting CPU time correctly to BOINC. This is why Windows 2000 is the oldest Windows OS platform that is officially supported. https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/rah_requirements.php ID: 7230 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote

Los Alcoholicos~La Muis Send message Joined: 4 Nov 05 Posts: 34 Credit: 1,041,724 RAC: 0	Message 7292 - Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 23:31:42 UTC I didn't know that... Well, I think it's time for a new OS then. ID: 7292 · Rating: 0 · rate: / Reply Quote