Message boards : Number crunching : Only one computer per wu? no checks?
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author | Message |
---|---|
Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 211 Credit: 4,246,150 RAC: 0 |
10 errors, #11 sent out.?. At least it has the 'too many errors' status now that the 11th copy has errored out. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
meckano Send message Joined: 4 Jan 06 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,457 RAC: 0 |
cool. For some reason 11 crossed my mind after I had posted; 10 error + 1 quorum. - the fun of programming :) sorta like: a = 0 if a > 10 goto... else... return that will run 11 times. and i remember the days when you could do the: else... before the: if a = 10 goto... which would also run 11 times. ----------------------- Click to see my tag My tag SNAFU'ed? Turn the Page! :D |
Webmaster Yoda Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 161 Credit: 162,253 RAC: 0 |
For some reason 11 crossed my mind after I had posted; 10 error + 1 quorum. - the fun of programming :) For i=0 to 10.... I think that's what's happening here. The very first WU sent out is number 0, not number 1 (have a look at the last number of the WU name on a work unit in your cache) I'm no programmer, but javascript arrays start with element 0 as well. *** Join BOINC@Australia today *** |
meckano Send message Joined: 4 Jan 06 Posts: 28 Credit: 16,457 RAC: 0 |
You get the cookie! :) The first is 0, the last is 10. Good go! https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=4513558 https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=6336470 I love to have answers. ----------------------- Click to see my tag My tag SNAFU'ed? Turn the Page! :D |
Ingleside Send message Joined: 25 Sep 05 Posts: 107 Credit: 1,514,472 RAC: 0 |
For i=0 to 10.... I think that's what's happening here. The very first WU sent out is number 0, not number 1 (have a look at the last number of the WU name on a work unit in your cache) I'm no programmer, but javascript arrays start with element 0 as well. The tests for error-limits is > This example means that in SETI@Home that has "Max success-results" = 5, if also the 6th result fails validation with "no consensus yet" does the Validator mark wu as errored-out. For too many errors and too many total results, this job is done by the Transitioner. |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 17 Sep 05 Posts: 815 Credit: 1,812,737 RAC: 0 |
This example means that in SETI@Home that has "Max success-results" = 5, if also the 6th result fails validation with "no consensus yet" does the Validator mark wu as errored-out. Assuming that this is a question. The answer is yes. The point being that if a work unit is "unstable" in the sense that it returns wildly different answers, then it is not likely we will get good science out of it. Or, that it needs a special look see. So, rather than send it out time after time, we quit even though it is not "blowing up" because the work unit is likely "bad". Really bad work units are likely to cause the application to client error, and we test for that at some upper limit. And, we test for a totality of succeses and failures to make sure that we don't stay below each of the limits but can't seem to get traction on the work unit. All of this has to be decided by the project and set to reasonable limits before they get underway ... |
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Only one computer per wu? no checks?
©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org