NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE ERRORS !!

Message boards : Number crunching : NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE ERRORS !!

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Hoelder1in
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 05
Posts: 169
Credit: 3,915,947
RAC: 0
Message 9833 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 18:35:52 UTC
Last modified: 25 Jan 2006, 18:45:53 UTC

I am sure someone must have noticed that all the NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE* WUs are erroring out after 30 seconds or so. This looks exactly like the "random seed error" we were having in late December shortly before the Holidays. I guess it would be best if the team would cancel this batch as soon as possible.
ID: 9833 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Moderator9
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 22 Jan 06
Posts: 1014
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 9855 - Posted: 25 Jan 2006, 22:17:46 UTC - in response to Message 9833.  

I am sure someone must have noticed that all the NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE* WUs are erroring out after 30 seconds or so. This looks exactly like the "random seed error" we were having in late December shortly before the Holidays. I guess it would be best if the team would cancel this batch as soon as possible.


I have notified David Kim and David baker about this issue and am making this a sticky until they can address it.


Moderator9
ROSETTA@home FAQ
Moderator Contact
ID: 9855 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile nasher

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 98
Credit: 618,288
RAC: 0
Message 9915 - Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 11:56:51 UTC

i am curently at sea so i cant go directly to my computer but lookin at my results i see errors on

DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1r69_280_178
DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_280_146
OMEGA_WT_1.0_2tif_282_24
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1n0u_251_9144

and also these that were completed sucesfully by another user
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1r69_251_19233
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1n0u_251_9144


in my returned results... only errors in the past month or so i think

hopefully we can sort out whatever errors are out there and hopefully we dont get many problems.. but i understand that they will always occour.

wish i was at home so i could walk up to the computers and physicaly check the work units as oposed to useing the results for user like i am now


ID: 9915 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile nasher

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 05
Posts: 98
Credit: 618,288
RAC: 0
Message 9916 - Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 12:02:41 UTC

another thing i just noticed the errors i had were all on the same computer..


this one

while my other computers seem fine including an identical computer that runs the same software and such..

not sure what to make of it.. but i though it might be of note
ID: 9916 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rebel Alliance

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 3,579,531
RAC: 0
Message 9948 - Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 18:09:13 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jan 2006, 18:17:50 UTC

I've had 5 in a row of these fail on my dual Opty 165 running stock at 1.8
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30

On another machine I've had 3 of these fail
OMEGA_WT_1.0_2tif_275_623

After checking I have found other machines that has had both of these work units failed.

ID: 9948 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
David Baker
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 705
Credit: 559,847
RAC: 0
Message 9970 - Posted: 26 Jan 2006, 23:04:30 UTC - in response to Message 9833.  

I am sure someone must have noticed that all the NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE* WUs are erroring out after 30 seconds or so. This looks exactly like the "random seed error" we were having in late December shortly before the Holidays. I guess it would be best if the team would cancel this batch as soon as possible.



we are trying to figure this out. in any event, only a small number of these were sent out, so the problem should disappear shortly. sorry!
ID: 9970 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
AMD_is_logical

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 05
Posts: 299
Credit: 31,460,681
RAC: 0
Message 9998 - Posted: 27 Jan 2006, 7:38:03 UTC

I had the following WUs error out quickly, and they errored out for everyone else they were sent to:
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_281_200
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_281_34
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_18
DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1r69_280_24
DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1b72_280_76
DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_280_54
DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1b72_280_55

One of my linux nodes had two other WUs with a different problem. As both WUs were on the same node I can't be sure it isn't a problem with that node. However, my nodes run at stock, and have been checked with memtest86 and a brief run with super pi.

I found the node hung at 60%. BOINC was responding to the manager, but wasn't incrementing the current time for the WU. The CPU was idle. Stopping and restarting BOINC allowed the WU to successfully finish and produce this result:
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1hz6_251_21191_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=7794890

I then noticed that the node had failed an earlier WU:
NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1dcj_251_6998_0
https://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/result.php?resultid=7559941

These two results have similar entries in their stderr files, but I don't know what those numbers mean.
ID: 9998 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Hoelder1in
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 05
Posts: 169
Credit: 3,915,947
RAC: 0
Message 10014 - Posted: 27 Jan 2006, 13:31:33 UTC - in response to Message 9998.  
Last modified: 27 Jan 2006, 13:34:54 UTC

DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_285_2 completed successfully on my computer. So in my case, only the units with the name given in the title of the thread errored out after about 30 seconds. Oh, just noticed that this is a different batch number, _285_ instead of _280_, so may be this is the reason for the different behaviour...
ID: 10014 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Angus

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 05
Posts: 412
Credit: 321,053
RAC: 0
Message 10079 - Posted: 28 Jan 2006, 2:06:16 UTC
Last modified: 28 Jan 2006, 2:27:23 UTC

Today:

1/27/2006 4:35:10 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_80_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:35:10 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:35:10 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_80_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:35:11 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_281_74_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:35:40 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_281_74_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:35:40 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:35:40 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_281_74_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:35:40 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_74_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:36:07 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_74_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:36:07 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:36:07 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_74_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:36:07 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1di2_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:36:39 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1di2_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:36:39 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:36:39 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1di2_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:36:39 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_82_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:37:09 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_82_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:37:09 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:37:09 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_82_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:37:09 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_84_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:37:36 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_84_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:37:36 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:37:36 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_281_84_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:37:36 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_86_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:38:08 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_86_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:38:08 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:38:08 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_86_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:38:08 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:38:41 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:38:41 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:38:41 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:38:41 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_280_83_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:39:08 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_280_83_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:39:08 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:39:08 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1hz6_280_83_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:39:08 PM||Allowing work fetch again.
1/27/2006 4:39:08 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_280_86_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:39:43 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_280_86_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:39:43 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:39:43 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_280_86_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:39:43 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:40:17 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:40:17 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:40:17 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dcj_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:40:18 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_82_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:40:51 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_82_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:40:51 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:40:51 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_82_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:40:51 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_83_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:41:23 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_83_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:41:23 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:41:23 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1dtj_281_83_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:41:23 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_80_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:41:51 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_80_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:41:51 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:41:51 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_80_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:41:52 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1ogw_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:42:25 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1ogw_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:42:25 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:42:25 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1ogw_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:42:25 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:42:52 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:42:52 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:42:52 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:42:52 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_79_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:43:19 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_79_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:43:19 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:43:19 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_79_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:43:20 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_88_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:43:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_88_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:43:48 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:43:48 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_280_88_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:43:48 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:44:16 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:44:16 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:44:16 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2tif_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:44:16 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:44:48 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:44:48 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:44:48 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:44:49 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1b72_281_87_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:45:15 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1b72_281_87_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:45:15 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:45:15 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_1b72_281_87_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:45:15 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_88_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:45:47 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_88_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:45:47 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:45:47 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1mky_280_88_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:45:47 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_280_84_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:46:15 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_280_84_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))
1/27/2006 4:46:15 PM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited
1/27/2006 4:46:15 PM|rosetta@home|Computation for result DEFAULT_RLX_NATIVE_1n0u_280_84_0 finished
1/27/2006 4:46:15 PM|rosetta@home|Starting result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_86_0 using rosetta version 481
1/27/2006 4:46:43 PM|rosetta@home|Unrecoverable error for result NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE_2reb_281_86_0 (Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1))


Time for a <RESET> and off to a different project.
Proudly Banned from Predictator@Home and now Cosmology@home as well. Added SETI to the list today. Temporary ban only - so need to work harder :)



"You can't fix stupid" (Ron White)
ID: 10079 · Rating: -1 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Rebel Alliance

Send message
Joined: 4 Nov 05
Posts: 50
Credit: 3,579,531
RAC: 0
Message 10090 - Posted: 28 Jan 2006, 5:37:50 UTC

NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_278_2151
25 Jan 2006 4:40:09 UTC 28 Jan 2006 5:25:43 UTC Over Client error Computing 260,224.27 1,133.72 ---

and

OMEGA_WT_1.0_2reb_275_2901
24 Jan 2006 11:04:19 UTC 28 Jan 2006 5:26:21 UTC Over Client error Computing 224,124.79 883.46

Two different machines. Had to abort both
ID: 10090 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Kevin

Send message
Joined: 15 Jan 06
Posts: 21
Credit: 109,496
RAC: 0
Message 10120 - Posted: 28 Jan 2006, 16:31:59 UTC

NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_1n0u_283_8640
Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)
wuid
ID: 10120 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Steve Shedroff

Send message
Joined: 7 Nov 05
Posts: 11
Credit: 250,657
RAC: 0
Message 10501 - Posted: 6 Feb 2006, 14:10:35 UTC

NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_286_4473_1 has run for over 20:13 hours and is but 1% complete. Looks like I should abort this one.
ID: 10501 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Carlos_Pfitzner
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 22 Dec 05
Posts: 71
Credit: 138,867
RAC: 0
Message 10677 - Posted: 11 Feb 2006, 21:48:46 UTC - in response to Message 10501.  

NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_2reb_286_4473_1 has run for over 20:13 hours and is but 1% complete. Looks like I should abort this one.


*It is running ?

Did u used
taskinfo2000 -> (windows98) & all windows versions
top -> linux
windows security -> windows XP
cntlr-alt-del (task manger) -> windows 2000
*and sorted by cpu usage -> to be sure that it is really "run for over x hours"?

Mine WUs when stuck, does *not* use CPU -> 99.99% of IDLE time for the system

The ones that are using CPU, will eventually finish OK
Be patient !
Click signature for global team stats
ID: 10677 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : NO_SIM_ANNEAL_BARCODE_30_RLX_NATIVE ERRORS !!



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org