RosettaFold is precise, but not "robust"

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : RosettaFold is precise, but not "robust"

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile [VENETO] boboviz

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 1994
Credit: 9,623,704
RAC: 9,591
Message 102632 - Posted: 16 Sep 2021, 13:01:02 UTC

Protein Folding Neural Networks Are Not Robust

Deep neural networks such as AlphaFold and RoseTTAFold predict remarkably accurate structures of proteins compared to other algorithmic approaches. It is known that biologically small perturbations in the protein sequence do not lead to drastic changes in the protein structure. In this paper, we demonstrate that RoseTTAFold does not exhibit such a robustness despite its high accuracy, and biologically small perturbations for some input sequences result in radically different predicted protein structures. This raises the challenge of detecting when these predicted protein structures cannot be trusted.


There is still a lot of work to do with AI in biology...
ID: 102632 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile dcdc

Send message
Joined: 3 Nov 05
Posts: 1831
Credit: 119,627,225
RAC: 11,586
Message 102719 - Posted: 19 Sep 2021, 10:47:20 UTC

Interesting! I presume old Rosetta can be of some help there to determine the robustness of the result.
ID: 102719 · Rating: 0 · rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive    Reply Quote

Message boards : Rosetta@home Science : RosettaFold is precise, but not "robust"



©2024 University of Washington
https://www.bakerlab.org